Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke has publicly rejected claims made by American singer Mary Millben, who alleged that his political outfit is being financed by donors in the United States. The controversy erupted on Wednesday when Millben asserted that certain US-based individuals, whom she described as opponents of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, were funding the CJP to orchestrate instability within India.
In a sharp rebuttal posted on the social media platform X, Dipke questioned the rationale behind foreign nationals intervening in the domestic political discourse of India. He challenged the premise of the accusations, questioning why the Prime Minister would seek the support of American figures to discredit his own countrymen. Dipke maintained that India is entirely capable of addressing its own internal issues without the input or interference of outsiders.
The allegations made by Millben suggest a broader, global pattern of foreign influence. She claimed that specific donors target conservative world leaders by identifying individuals educated in the US, radicalising them, and sending them back to their home countries to trigger chaos. According to Millben, while these attempts have not successfully toppled governments, they have impacted the governance and development of several nations. She urged young Indian patriots to organise and peacefully protest against the CJP, describing the party as a disruptive force.
The exchange occurs against a backdrop of ongoing political activity involving the CJP. Currently, the party is leading protests against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR), with activists demanding its rollback and calling for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The CJP previously gained national attention in July 2026, when it spearheaded widespread protests among the youth regarding reported irregularities in the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET-UG). Those demonstrations resulted in the resignation of Dharmendra Pradhan from his position as Union Education Minister.
Millben, who has frequently voiced her support for Prime Minister Modi, framed her comments as a call to action for Indian youth. She noted that the Prime Minister has served the country for 25 years, including 12 years as head of the government, and stated that he would not yield to pressures originating from her country. Her call for a "counter movement" highlights the sharpening divide between the CJP and its critics.
Dipke’s response, however, emphasises a firm stance against external criticism. By labelling the intervention as an encroachment on India's sovereign internal affairs, he has sought to shift the narrative away from his party's funding sources and back toward the question of foreign meddling in Indian politics. The debate underscores the increasing intensity of the current political climate as the CJP continues to challenge existing governance frameworks.
As these accusations and counter-claims continue to circulate, observers note that the discourse reflects the heightened sensitivity surrounding political funding and external influence in Indian democracy. For now, the CJP continues its stated objectives, including the ongoing opposition to the Special Intensive Revision, despite the intensifying public scrutiny surrounding the party's activities and international allegations.
Comments