Nitesh Tiwari’s Ramayana: Part I, which features Ranbir Kapoor, Sai Pallavi, and Yash, has achieved significant commercial success, crossing the Rs 600 crore mark at the worldwide box office. Despite its performance, the film has sparked intense public debate over the depiction of Maa Sita, specifically in sequences where the character is shown wielding a sword and engaging in combat.
Indira Krishnan, who is part of the film's cast, recently shared her perspective on the controversy. In an interview, she stated that she understands the audience's reaction, noting that she never viewed Sita as a warrior while growing up and watching previous television adaptations. However, she defended the director's creative approach by explaining that the intent was to ensure no female characters in the film were portrayed as weak.
“The makers wanted to portray that Sita isn’t weak. She belonged to a family of warriors where they made sure that the girl child learns the art of wielding a sword,” Krishnan told reporters. She added that the sequence was intended to highlight the valour of a character who was otherwise soft-minded, asserting that the filmmakers did not intend to change mythology, but rather wanted to showcase the inherent strength of women.
The portrayal has faced sharp criticism from actor Mukesh Khanna, who took to his YouTube vlog to object to the combat scenes. Khanna argued that there is no basis for a warrior Sita in Valmiki’s Ramayana and questioned the authenticity of the creative choices made by the producers. He further challenged the producers’ reported justification that the sequence was inspired by the Adbhuta Ramayana, stating that the original Ramayana written by Valmiki should be the primary reference point.
Key facts
- 'Ramayana: Part I' has earned over Rs 600 crore at the global box office.
- Sai Pallavi previously stated that she practiced sword fighting with stunt directors for the role.
- Mukesh Khanna questioned why Sita did not fight Ravana during her abduction if she were a warrior.
- Indira Krishnan stated that the creative team aimed to show that Sita was raised in a family of warriors.
Why it matters
The debate highlights a tension between modern cinematic interpretations of epic narratives and established cultural expectations. As the film continues its theatrical run, the discourse reflects varying viewer attitudes toward the artistic liberties taken by contemporary filmmakers when adapting traditional texts.
Background
The film, produced by Namit Malhotra and directed by Nitesh Tiwari, has become a subject of discussion regarding the balance between commercial storytelling and the historical or mythological accuracy of the Ramayana.
Source: Times of India, Indian Express
Comments