Voters across the United States signaled widespread resistance to the expansion of digital infrastructure during the recent midterm elections. According to data provided by the election-monitoring project 'Data Centers on the Ballot,' operated by Redbud Consulting, there were 41 ballot measures related to data centre development nationwide. In a decisive trend, voters moved to reject or place strict limits on these projects in 40 of those contests.
The only exception occurred in the small town of Harwood, North Dakota, which holds a population of fewer than 800 residents. In that instance, voters opted against a measure that would have mandated independent reviews for large-scale industrial projects, including data centres, prior to construction. While two additional races remain under official tally, analysts expect them to follow the broader national trend of restricting such developments.
The pushback highlights a growing bipartisan concern regarding the physical footprint of artificial intelligence. Research from September indicated that 70 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of Republicans favored placing limits on new data centre construction. Experts suggest the issue has transcended traditional party lines, becoming deeply intertwined with anxieties over economic stability, job security, and the rising cost of living.
Bhaskar Chakravorti, the dean of global business at Tufts University, noted that the unchecked acceleration of AI development is causing anxiety across the spectrum. The physical manifestations of this technology, often located in residential backyards, have become a focal point for public frustration. Beyond job-related fears, residents are increasingly vocal about the high consumption of energy and water required by these facilities, which critics argue drives up local utility bills.
Economic data appears to validate some of these community concerns. A 2026 working paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated that wholesale electricity prices had increased by 6.9 percent due to the prevalence of data centres. James Mercer, founder of the advisory firm Metro Colo, explained that the scale of power required by these facilities—often comparable to that of a small city—has mobilized local opposition and sparked numerous zoning disputes.
This sentiment became a defining feature of several high-profile political campaigns. In Ohio, which hosted 21 of the 47 relevant ballot measures nationwide, Democrat Sherrod Brown successfully flipped a Senate seat. Brown centered his campaign on criticizing Republican incumbent Jon Husted’s support for data centre development. Similarly, in Texas, the gubernatorial race saw Democrat Gina Hinojosa defeat incumbent Greg Abbott after calling for a moratorium on new data centre approvals.
Texas has become a specific site of concern regarding environmental resources, particularly water scarcity. In cities like Corpus Christi, where reservoirs have dropped to 8 percent of capacity, the heavy water demands of AI infrastructure have drawn intense scrutiny. State Senator-elect James Talarico campaigned on a platform of increased regulation, advocating for closed-loop water systems to mitigate the impact of these facilities on local water supplies.
As the country grapples with the growth of its digital economy, the infrastructure expansion continues to face administrative and social hurdles. With approximately 3,000 data centres already operational as of April and another 1,500 in the development pipeline, the results of this election suggest that future expansion may face significantly higher levels of local regulatory oversight and public opposition.
Comments