Israel is set to hold a critical general election on Tuesday, October 27, marking the first nationwide vote since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023. This election represents a defining moment for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's longest-serving leader, whose political tenure now faces immense scrutiny following three years of war and significant domestic unrest.
As the country prepares for the polls, recent opinion surveys from Israel's three major television networks indicate a highly competitive race. The projections suggest that Gadi Eisenkot’s Yashar party is currently leading Prime Minister Netanyahu's Likud party. However, analysts note that neither the incumbent coalition—estimated at approximately 50 seats—nor the primary opposition bloc, projected at 52 to 56 seats, is expected to secure the 61-seat majority required to control the 120-member Knesset.
The central figure challenging Netanyahu is Gadi Eisenkot, a former chief of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). Eisenkot served as the nation's military chief from 2015 to 2019 and was part of the wartime government formed immediately following the October 7 incident. He eventually departed the administration in June 2024, citing his belief that political motivations were improperly influencing military strategy. In September 2025, he broke away from Benny Gantz to establish his own party, Yashar.
Eisenkot’s platform does not reflect a traditional left-wing challenge; rather, it focuses on the need for greater military accountability and a shift in leadership. He maintains a firm stance on security, arguing that the existing government's handling of the war and the intelligence failures leading up to the October 7 attack necessitate a change in direction. Many within the opposition share this perspective, asserting that Netanyahu's policies have ultimately compromised rather than fortified Israeli security.
The October 7 attack, which resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 people and the taking of 251 hostages, remains the primary focal point of the campaign. Critics of the government continue to demand an independent state commission of inquiry into the military and intelligence failures that allowed the assault to occur. Netanyahu, however, has resisted these calls for an investigation, which would likely scrutinize his administration’s decision-making process.
The Prime Minister’s campaign faces further complexity due to his ongoing legal battles. Netanyahu is currently standing trial on charges of fraud, bribery, and breach of trust, all of which he denies. Additionally, he faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to the war in Gaza, a development he rejects. Reports also surfaced recently alleging that he had received advance warnings from Egypt and the UAE regarding Hamas's intentions; Netanyahu has dismissed these claims as libelous and is pursuing legal action against those who reported them.
Dr. Ashok Sharma, a visiting fellow at the University of New South Wales, observed that while the events of October 7 have severely impacted Netanyahu's standing as a security-focused leader, his political resilience should not be dismissed. Supporters often view his leadership through the lens of the subsequent military campaigns against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. As the nation approaches the October 27 vote, the fundamental question remains whether the Israeli electorate will prioritize Netanyahu’s experience or shift their support toward an alternative coalition promising a different approach to national security.
Comments