The Mumbai Police have officially refuted claims circulating on social media regarding the motive behind the recent attack on actor Tiger Shroff. While an individual claiming to represent the Lawrence Bishnoi gang alleged in an audio clip and social media post that the actor was targeted for his close relationship with Salman Khan and for ignoring previous warnings, law enforcement officials have presented a starkly different account to the court.
According to the police’s remand application submitted on Friday, the attack was not motivated by personal vendettas or celebrity associations, but was instead a calculated effort to gain financial leverage, establish criminal dominance in the region, and incite public terror. This narrative aligns with the investigative findings presented in previous high-profile cases handled by the department, including the firing incident involving Rohit Shetty, the murder of Baba Siddique, and the shooting case involving Salman Khan. In each of these instances, police chargesheets have maintained that the overarching objective of the gang’s activities was to create an atmosphere of fear to facilitate systematic extortion.
The three suspects—identified as Jatin Panchal, Samir Khatri, and Ankit Khatak—were apprehended by authorities in Sonipat, Haryana, and subsequently presented before an Esplanade court. During the hearing, the prosecution requested police custody until October 31 to conduct a thorough investigation into the suspects' involvement, their connections to a wanted individual identified as Anil Pandit, and the origin of the firearms used in the attack. Police also informed the court that the suspects had reportedly conducted surveillance on the residences of several influential figures in Mumbai before carrying out their plans, and that they had intended to flee the country following the incident.
Advocate Ajinkya Mirgal, representing the accused, opposed the police’s request for extended custody, arguing that authorities had already recovered pertinent evidence from the hotel room where the trio allegedly engaged in firing practice. He suggested that the police’s goals could be achieved by seizing electronic devices belonging to the suspects, rather than keeping them in custody. However, the police pushed back, highlighting a specific incident of an accidental misfire that occurred during the suspects' stay at the hotel. They argued that a deeper investigation into this event and the broader network behind the group was necessary.
The court ultimately granted the police’s request for custody, though it set the deadline for October 28 rather than the requested October 31. This period is expected to be utilized by investigators to examine the three individuals in connection with the ongoing probe into the city’s security situation. The case has drawn significant attention, with observers and public figures noting that such incidents continue to cast a shadow of fear over the local entertainment industry.
As the investigation proceeds, the Mumbai Police continue to map out the connections between the arrested individuals and larger organized criminal syndicates. The authorities remain focused on uncovering the logistical network that allowed the suspects to operate within the city, perform reconnaissance on prominent targets, and manage the procurement of illegal weaponry. With the suspects now in custody, the focus shifts to interrogation and the verification of digital evidence retrieved from the seized devices, which investigators hope will clarify the group’s hierarchy and future operational plans.
This ongoing case underscores the persistent challenge faced by law enforcement in addressing the activities of gangs attempting to exert influence over public life through targeted violence. By categorizing the incident under the broader framework of extortion and terror, the police are signaling a firm approach to curb such criminal trends. The legal proceedings in the coming days are expected to shed more light on the extent of the suspects' activities and the effectiveness of the current security measures in protecting high-profile residents of the city.
Comments