The Delhi High Court on Thursday issued an order declining to stay the release of the film 'Doosra', despite a legal challenge filed by former Indian cricket captain Sourav Ganguly. The movie, which depicts themes tied to the athlete's professional career, is scheduled to hit theatres on Friday. While the court refused to grant an immediate injunction on its release, it confirmed that proceedings regarding the former cricketer’s plea would continue on Friday.
In his petition, Sourav Ganguly has alleged that the film infringes upon his personality and commercial rights. According to the court filings, the former captain contends that the filmmakers have utilized specific references to his identity and cricketing achievements in an unauthorized manner. The plea specifically highlights the depiction of his tenure as the captain of the Indian national team, as well as the historic 2002 NatWest Series final played against England.
A significant portion of the controversy centers on the inclusion of the iconic moment following India's dramatic victory in that 2002 final. Ganguly’s shirtless celebration on the balcony of Lord’s Cricket Ground remains one of the most enduring and recognizable images in the history of Indian cricket. By including these elements in the cinematic narrative, Ganguly argues that the makers have engaged in the unauthorized commercial use of his public persona, necessitating legal intervention to protect his identity.
The ongoing litigation has brought to the forefront broader legal questions regarding the boundaries of creative expression in filmmaking. The case examines the extent to which producers and directors are permitted to incorporate the life stories, professional milestones, and public image of prominent sportspersons into their works without explicit authorization. It also explores the specific circumstances under which such artistic depictions can be categorized as a violation of an individual’s personality rights.
This case serves as a notable example of the increasing frequency of personality rights disputes within the Indian legal system. In recent years, an growing number of public figures, including celebrities and athletes, have approached the courts to seek protection for their names, images, likenesses, and other distinct features of their identity. These plaintiffs aim to safeguard their personal brands against what they characterize as unauthorized commercial exploitation by third parties.
As the legal battle unfolds, the focus remains on the interpretation of personality rights in the context of biographical or sports-themed narratives. The court's decision to allow the scheduled release to proceed while keeping the matter pending highlights the complex nature of balancing artistic freedom with the rights of public figures to control the commercial use of their likenesses.
For the time being, the film's release date remains unchanged, meaning the project will be available for public viewing as planned. As the court proceedings continue on Friday, legal observers will be watching to see how the judiciary balances these conflicting interests. The outcome of the case could have significant implications for how future films, documentaries, and media productions navigate the depiction of real-life public figures and their career-defining moments in India.
Comments